![]() Free markets dont benefit consumers, competitive markets do. Napster wasn't completely free - it came with the costs legality and a bit of tech know how, but it brought competition to the industry.Īnd overall it again exposed one of the key points. The music industry was a racket.Ĭompletely true - and the reason why, is because it forced competition on the music industry. This is the subject of a piece of work I did for the independent music labels in the UK in early 2000s and it's still relevant. The winners are most likely the distributors of music across all platforms - Spotify look like a good bet. I believe that the pressure will be on the labels and artists at this time, and that even with technology helping to reduce the cost of recording and releasing music it's going to be hard on them. those who most control the critical parts of distribution or playback at that time will be able extract the most revenue from the total revenue that exists. Long-term, when the final vestiges of openly available music vanish (CDs gone, streamed content heavily DRM'd), prices will definitely rise, or at least. Lesson here if no-one saw it, the more you control the means of distribution and playback, the higher the price you can extract from the listener. equivalent to a per song value far higher £1 per 10 seconds of song in a simplified midi track. Cyndi Lauper sure got everyone on their feet.” Cyndi, 65, performed a rousing rendition of Cher’s 1989 smash “If I Could Turn Back Time.” Cher herself was shocked, even yelling out from her balcony seat “You told me you were going to Los Angeles” and Cyndi could be seen mouthing back “I lied.This was also the time where music had the highest value. Adam Lambert put a whole new emotional spin to ‘Believe.’ I could tell it left you breathless. “Adam Lambert is absolutely crushing Cher’s ‘Do You Believe in Life After Love’ at the Kennedy Center Honors 2018! What an incredible performance! His vocals are amazing!” one woman tweeted while another added, “”OMG my husband and I just finished watching it. He was amazing BRAVO.” One person wrote, “Normally, Believe is my least favorite Cher song, but DAMN, Adam Lambert is making me change my mind. ![]() “I need Adam Lambert’s recorded version of Cher’s Believe now! Come on Make it Happen!” one fan wrote while another added “Adam Lambert sang that song like the love of his life just left him before he walked on stage. Adam got a standing ovation at the end of the song and even made Cher cry!įans immediately melted over his beautiful rendition and Adam’s name soon became a hot trending Twitter topic. Even the Kennedy Center knew it was going to bring us to near tears by tweeting out “We hope you kept the tissues close- gorgeous take on ‘Believe’ is coming for your tear ducts,” just before his performance aired. Backed by an orchestra, the current Queen frontman slowed the song way down to a heartfelt serenade during the ceremony, which took place on Dec. ![]() But the 36-year-old absolutely crushed a heartbreaking ballad rendition of her 1998 dance hit “Believe” at the 2018 Kennedy Center Honors, which was televised on Dec. We can’t imagine how stressful it had to have been for Adam Lambert to pay tribute to national treasure Cher in song with the 72-year-old looking on.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |